PL Plonex Top Plonex Trade →
Русский updated 11.10.2026 14:14

DaniilGold

Cadet Cadet Inactive Copy ↗
Followers6
Trading Days924
Stability Index0.0/5.0
7-Day Views1
AUM+44,820.17 USDT
Total Assets+1,094.87 USDT
Profit Sharing10.00%
Slots Left95

Monthly Returns

Jan Feb Mar* Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct* Nov Dec 2026
0 0 +7.9% +10.3% -22.3% -51.7% +17.8% +43.8% +11.0% -7.2% 0 0 -22.1%

Traded Symbols

3 symbols
ETHUSDT 1 Orders +0.00
GRAMUSDT 1 Orders +0.00
TONUSDT 0 Orders -16.81

Closed Trades

No data

Review for the subscriber

Quiet and risky: copying hardly makes sense

Traded 196 of 198 days - trades daily. 103 winning days, 93 losing, 2 flat. Important detail: on losing days the account loses -3.3% on average while earning +2.9% on winning days - the loss is bigger than the win. Cross-check with the exchange: its per-trade win rate is 7%, but only 53% of days are profitable - few large trades carry the result.

Return per month +1.1%
Subscriber after fee +1.0%
Risk medium
Active days 196 / 198
Day factor 0.89
Worst day -29.5%
Drawdown -71%

Return: +1.1% per month by exchange data (ROI +9.4% over 180 days), about +14% annualised. Above 76% of traders in the base, where the median is about -0.9% per month. By our monthly slices the best month is +43.8%, the worst -51.7%. The trader's 10% fee on follower profit leaves about +1.0% per month on your account, before copy slippage. Followers have been in the red for the whole period (-51 k): the trader's profit never reached them. The account has been running for 924 day - not a newcomer, there is a long history.

Risk: daily swings 4.6%, worst day -29.5%, never two losing days in a row. Maximum drawdown of the cumulative account -71% - deep: the same can happen to a follower, because the same positions are copied.

Transparency: trades are visible and can be verified.

What to do as a subscriber

  • By return there is little reason to copy - the same money is easier to keep in staking or in index instruments.
  • Do not expect smooth growth: losing days are heavier than winning ones.

The review uses data from 28.03.2026 - the last 198 day of observations. The account has been running for 924 day, so we did not see the earlier history. The review is generated automatically from Bybit data and our own recalculation of the daily series. It is not investment advice.